🔧️ SECONDARY OPERATIONS · REAM · HONE · SKIVE & BURNISH

Finishing Operations

Deep hole drilling rarely delivers the final bore. Reaming, honing, roller burnishing, and skive & burnish bring the as-drilled hole to specification — tighter tolerance, better finish, and a stronger surface layer. This guide covers process selection, achievable results, stock removal, and setup practice.

Ra 0.05–0.4Best finish µmSkive & burnish / burnish
IT5–IT9ToleranceAcross all methods
0.01–0.8Stock removal mmOn diameter
6MethodsReam · hone · skive · pull · burnish · lap

Why Deep Holes Need a Second Operation

As-drilled finishes typically land in the Ra 1.6–6.3 µm band depending on method, material, and parameters; gundrilling on a good day holds Ra 0.4–1.8 µm. Functional bores demand far better, and many callouts sit below Ra 0.8 µm — a threshold that virtually always requires a dedicated finishing pass.

Ra 0.1–0.4
µm
Hydraulic cylinders — seal compatibility & low friction
Ra 0.05–0.2
µm
Bearings & bushings — rolling element contact
Ra 0.2–0.8
µm
Fuel injector bores — metering accuracy
Ra 0.4–0.8
µm
Precision valve spool bores — minimal leakage

Finishing does two jobs at once. It corrects geometry the drill left behind — taper, ovality, bell-mouth, and straightness drift — and it changes the surface layer. Cutting processes leave tensile residual stress and feed marks that act as stress concentrators; cold-working processes (burnishing, skive & burnish) leave a compressive layer that blocks crack initiation and measurably extends fatigue life.

⚠️ The trap: Finishing cannot fix a crooked bore. Stock removal is small — typically 0.01–0.8 mm on diameter. If the drilled hole drifts, oversizes, or tapers beyond the finishing allowance, the part is scrap. Fix straightness and size at the drilling stage, not downstream.
💡 As-drilled reality check: Solid-carbide gundrills commonly produce Ra 0.4–1.6 µm — good enough to skip reboring for many applications. But on Inconel 718 and other superalloys, chip entrapment can leave a smeared “white layer” that fails aerospace standards; reaming (to ~Ra 0.18 µm) and mill boring (to Ra 0.05–0.06 µm) both remove it in published studies.

Reaming — Size & Smooth in One Pass

The most common secondary operation for deep holes. A multi-flute reamer removes a thin layer (0.1–0.5 mm on diameter) with a shear cut to improve size and finish while preserving the existing hole axis. Deep hole reamers carry carbide or PCD edges and push coolant through the tool body for chip control at depth.

AttributeValue
Achievable finishRa 0.8–3.2 µm; fine reaming to ~Ra 0.2–0.4 µm demonstrated
ToleranceIT6–IT8; aerospace bores to ±0.0005 in on diameter
Stock removal0.1–0.5 mm on diameter (rough allowance 0.15–0.35 mm, fine 0.05–0.15 mm)
Cutting dataVc 20–60 m/min, feed 0.05–0.3 mm/rev; HSS reamers run slower (<8 m/min on steel and cast iron)
Surface integrityAs-cut, no compressive layer; feed marks can concentrate stress

✅ Strengths

  • Fast, economical way to hold tight positional and size tolerances
  • Follows the drilled hole — the axis stays where the drill put it
  • PCD reamers keep a sharp edge for fuel-injector and metering-quality bores

⚠️ Limits

  • Cannot correct straightness, taper, or axis deviation — it is a follower, not a corrector
  • Unsuitable for stepped or blind deep holes
  • No compressive residual stress benefit for fatigue-critical parts

BTA reaming for larger bores

BTA reaming (self-piloting reaming) sizes pre-drilled, cast, or rolled holes with light stock removal at high speeds and feeds — accuracy IT6–IT9, finish Ra 0.4–1.6 µm. Heads are available chip-forward (through holes) and chip-back (blind holes), with 45° or 20° lead angles. Per-side depths of cut run ~1 mm on small heads up to ~3 mm on large ones when sizing as-drilled blanks (American Heller RBTU data).

Honing — The Precision & Oil-Retention Standard

Bonded abrasive stones on an expanding mandrel rotate and reciprocate simultaneously, tracing a figure-eight path that leaves the characteristic cross-hatch. That pattern is functional: intersecting grooves hold oil for lubrication while plateaus carry the load. Honing corrects out-of-roundness, taper, bell-mouth, and barrel shape with very small stock removal.

Ra 0.1–0.8
µm
Conventional honing (microhoning to Ra 0.05–0.10)
IT5–IT7
grade
Tightest practical bore tolerance
0.01–0.1
mm
Typical stock removal (0.02–0.2 mm to fix form errors)
6–750+
mm
Diameter range; lengths to 12 m
40–60°
included
Engine-bore cross-hatch angle
36–600
grit
Stone grit range (superfinishing 320–1200)
💡 Surface integrity: Abrasive honing leaves a thin, moderate compressive layer with no heat-affected zone, and surface damage is shallow (roughly 2.5–25 µm deep). For components that must retain oil and survive fatigue, honing is the traditional answer.

Skive & Burnish — Two Processes, One Pass

Also called skiving and roller burnishing. The tool carries carbide skiving knives that cut a thin layer off the bore, immediately followed by rollers that cold-work the freshly cut surface to a mirror finish — geometry from the cutting edge, finish from the rollers, in a single pass.

AttributeValue
Achievable finishRa 0.05–0.4 µm; mirror finishes of 0.13–0.20 µm reported
ToleranceIT6–IT8; bore diameter and roundness to 0.0005 in (0.013 mm)
Stock removal0.05–0.2 mm on diameter
Surface layerCompressive residual stress; surface hardness up to ~10 HRC higher
ProductivityOne pass; ~10–20× the speed of honing — roughly 1 m finished in 1–3 minutes
Cost60–75% cheaper per hole than honing at volume

Configurations: the tool skives on the feed stroke and burnishes on the return (push-pull), or a one-direction head does both in a single forward pass. Tooling is specific to bore diameter and length. VDI 3209 Blatt 2 gives the reference data for skiving and roller burnishing of bores, and is used alongside VDI 3210 and VDI 3209 Part 1.

Pull Boring — The Straightness Machine

Pull boring draws the cutting head back through the workpiece on a tensioned bar instead of pushing it. The bar rotates one way while the workpiece counter-rotates, and coolant around the bar washes chips out through the hollow center. Because the tool works under tension, pull boring is the most effective finishing pass for straightness in long bores.

⚠️ Note: Pull boring corrects the geometry the drill left behind, but it still needs a reasonable start — rough the hole first and leave clean, consistent stock. A heavily deviated hole can defeat even a pull-boring pass.

Roller Burnishing — Cold-Work to a Mirror

Chipless and chip-free: hardened rollers press the bore surface so the peaks flow plastically into the valleys. No material is removed — the process rearranges what is there, so the stock allowance is zero. The trade-off is that burnishing only works on a surface that is already close to shape and finish.

AttributeValue
Achievable finishRa 0.05–0.4 µm (tool makers quote Ra ≤0.1 µm with suitable tools); a copper comparison measured Ra 0.09 µm — best of all methods tested
Hardness gain+5–10% from work hardening (up to ~10 HRC reported)
FatigueLife improved 20–50% by the compressive residual stress layer
Size controlWithin 0.0005 in or better on diameter
RangeØ3.7–200 mm and up, on through and blind holes
MaterialsPlastically formable metals to ~HRC 45 / 1400 N/mm² (deep rolling to 65 HRC)

✅ Strengths

  • Mirror finish with no chips, no dust, and minimal coolant burden
  • Compressive layer improves fatigue and corrosion resistance
  • Can replace grinding, honing, lapping, and fine boring in many bores

⚠️ Limits

  • Requires a prior finish of Ra ≤3.2 µm — it cannot fix rough or out-of-round bores
  • No stock removal — size must already be close to final
  • Wrong pressure, pass count, or feed causes flaking or cracking of the surface

Lapping — The Last Word in Finish

Lapping uses loose abrasive between the bore and a lap tool to remove sub-micron layers by three-body abrasion. It is the slowest and most expensive finishing option, reserved for the bores where nothing else is good enough.

Finishing Methods at a Glance

ProcessAchievable RaTolerance (IT)Stock RemovalCapabilityRelative Cost
Reaming0.8–3.2 µmIT6–IT80.1–0.5 mmSizes the hole; follows the axisLow
BTA reaming0.4–1.6 µmIT6–IT90.2–0.8 mm (to ~3 mm/side on large heads)Sizes as-drilled blanks at high feedModerate
Honing0.1–0.8 µmIT5–IT70.01–0.1 mmCorrects form; cross-hatch for oil retentionModerate–High
Roller burnishing0.05–0.4 µmIT7–IT9None (cold deformation)Mirror + compressive layer; needs a good prior boreLow–Moderate
Skive & burnish0.05–0.4 µmIT6–IT80.05–0.2 mmOne-pass finish + geometry + compressive layerHighest tooling, lowest per-part at volume
Pull boring0.2–1.6 µmIT7–IT90.2–1.0 mm+Best straightness correction; sizes and roundsModerate–High
Lapping0.025–0.2 µmIT5+MicronsSub-micron texture; slowHighest
💡 Reading the table: every row trades capability against cost. If the bore must be straight and mirror-smooth and fatigue-rated in volume, skive & burnish wins. If you only need size and a modest finish at low cost, ream. If you need the tightest tolerance with oil retention, hone.

Skive & Burnish — The Premium One-Pass Finish

For hydraulic and pneumatic cylinder tubes — the classic skive & burnish application — the economics are the whole story. Where conventional honing needs 2–5 passes to size and finish a bore, skive & burnish does it in one: the carbide knives true the round and cut to size, and the rollers behind them cold-work the surface in the same stroke. Published comparisons put it at 60–90% faster than honing and 60–75% cheaper per hole, with a harder surface (up to ~10 HRC) and better seal life.

38–400
mm
Typical tool diameter range
12
m
Maximum bore depth on CNC machines
1–3
min/m
Finished length per minute of cycle
<0.01
mm
Roundness / ellipticity achievable
3–6
mm/rev
Feed on combined tools
≤45
HRC
Workpiece hardness limit

Why the compressive layer matters

Rollers iron the surface and leave deep compressive residual stress that seals micro-cracks and pushes crack initiation deeper into the part. For fatigue-critical components — landing gear, turbine shafts, suspension hardware — specify burnishing or skive & burnish: the compressive layer extends component life by roughly 2–5× versus as-drilled or reamed surfaces. It is the single most valuable finishing trick in precision deep bores.

The catch: raw material

Skive & burnish works best on straight, consistent starting stock — cold-drawn and seamless cylinder tubes are ideal. It is more sensitive to the initial curvature of the raw tube than a boring-plus-burnish line; if raw tubes are heat-treated, tempered, or variable, expect higher rejection unless the process is tuned for it.

✅ Bottom line: skive & burnish is the premium finish when cycle time and per-part cost dominate — hydraulic cylinders, pneumatic tubes, and any high-volume deep bore that needs a mirror finish, tight tolerance, and a compressive surface in one pass.

Choosing the Right Finishing Process

🕐
Cycle time rules→ Skive & burnish
🔬
Tightest tolerance + oil→ Honing
🎯
Size & position only→ Ream / BTA ream
⭐
Mirror + fatigue life→ Roller / skive & burnish

Application map

ApplicationRecommended ProcessWhy
Hydraulic cylinder tubesSkive & burnishMirror finish + tight tolerance in one pass; compressive layer improves fatigue life
Bearing surfaces (connecting rods, shafts)HoningCross-hatch for oil retention; tightest tolerances (IT5–IT6)
Precision valve boresReaming or honingReam for moderate finish at low cost; hone for the highest precision
Static seal surfacesRoller burnishingMirror finish eliminates leaks; cold working raises surface hardness
Fuel injector boresReaming (PCD)Sharp edge holds; consistent size for metering accuracy
Mold cooling channelsRoller burnishingSmooth surface improves heat transfer; no cutting edges to break in small bores
Gun barrels / rifled boresPull boring then honingPrecision geometry required before the rifling operation
Large BTA-drilled bores (>50 mm)BTA reaming or skive & burnishHigh stock removal capacity; single-pass finishing to tight tolerance
⚠️ Batch economics: skive & burnish tooling is expensive and bore-specific. Below ~100 parts, honing is usually the more economical route; above thousands of parts, skive & burnish wins on per-part cost because it is a single pass.

Setup Notes & Stock Allowances

Stock removal figures below are per side and assume the bore is within straightness and roundness before finishing. Leave too little and the tool cannot clean up the drilling marks; leave too much and finish quality, tool life, and cycle time all suffer.

Bore DiameterReaming (per side)Honing (per side)Skive & Burnish (per side)
< 10 mm0.05–0.15 mm0.005–0.025 mm0.025–0.05 mm
10–50 mm0.10–0.25 mm0.01–0.05 mm0.05–0.10 mm
50–200 mm0.15–0.40 mm0.02–0.08 mm0.075–0.15 mm
> 200 mm0.25–0.50 mm0.03–0.10 mm0.10–0.20 mm
1
Drill the best hole you can

Straightness and size are set at the drill. Finishing cleans up only the last fraction of a millimetre.

2
Verify the start bore

Check taper, roundness, and bell-mouth against the finishing allowance before committing a costly tool.

3
Pre-finish to Ra ≤3.2 µm

Required before roller burnishing — burnishing cannot fix a rough or out-of-round bore.

4
Align the tool to the bore

Every reamer, hone, and skive head follows what the start bore offers — misalignment shows up as a bell mouth.

5
Flush with clean, filtered coolant

Chips recirculated through the bore scratch a finish that cost you money to make. Filter to 10–30 µm for finishing passes.

💡 Tolerance stacking: as-drilled (Ra 1.6–6.3 µm) → ream (Ra 0.8–3.2) → hone (Ra 0.1–0.8) → burnish / skive (Ra 0.05–0.4). Each stage must be justified by the callout; extra stages add setup time and cost.

Practical Tips from the Shop Floor

⚠️ Safety: finishing tools run at low speeds but high pressures. Keep hands clear of rotating bars and expanding mandrels, guard the work zone, and disconnect high-pressure coolant lines only after relieving pressure at the pump.

Keep Reading