💵 COST · PER-HOLE & MACHINE NUMBERS

How Much Does Deep Hole Drilling Cost

“How much does deep hole drilling cost?” has two answers — the price of the machine, and the cost of each hole. Both are dominated by a few drivers: method choice, diameter, depth, material, and whether you already own the coolant system. This page walks the actual numbers, from regional machine-hour rates to a fully worked cost-per-hole example.

$0.5–$20+per holeTypical unit cost
$40–$150+/hrmachine rateBy region & machine class
$50k–$800k+machineBy method & class
70–85%of costMachine time + tooling

Machine Investment by Method

MethodEntry machine costWhat you get
Ejector retrofit$30k–$100kConvert an existing lathe; no face seal needed
Gundrill machine$50k–$200kSingle-spindle, small-to-medium bores
BTA machine$200k–$800k+High metal removal, larger bores, high volume
Multi-spindle / special$500k+High production, large parts (e.g. tube sheets)
💡 The coolant system is half the machine: high-pressure coolant, filtration and chip handling often add 20–50% to the bare machine price. For a full picture see the Machine Prices guide.

Machine-Hour Rates by Region (2025)

The machine-hour rate — the number your cycle time is multiplied by — varies more by region and machine class than by anything else. These are typical shop rates for precision machining, including labor, depreciation and overhead (material, setup and finishing billed separately):

Region3-axis milling4/5-axis & SwissRelative cost
United States$30–$120/hr$75–$300+/hrBaseline
Europe€40–€100/hr€100–€150/hrSimilar to US
China$25–$60/hr$50–$150/hr~30–60% cheaper
India$4–$12/hrlowestLowest-cost option

What is inside the rate? A typical $80/hr 3-axis rate breaks down roughly as: labor $30 · overhead $24 · depreciation $10 · tooling wear $8 · maintenance $5 · coolant $2 · electricity $1. A deep hole machine adds high-pressure coolant, filtration and chip handling to that base.

⚠️ Watch the extra fees: setup runs $50–$200 per job, CAM programming $50–$150/hr, and material carries an 18–35% markup. On short runs, setup — not machine time — dominates the quote.

Cost Per Hole — the Drivers

Unit cost is machine-hour rate times cycle time, plus tooling and coolant:

Example boreMethodApprox. cost/hole
Ø10 mm × 200 mm, steelGundrill$1–$4
Ø50 mm × 1 m, steelBTA$15–$40
Ø8 mm × 300 mm, InconelGundrill$8–$25
Ø150 mm × 3 m, steel (trepan)BTA / trepan$200–$600

Worked example — Ø10 mm × 200 mm, carbon steel, gundrill

1
Cycle time

Vc 80 m/min → spindle ≈ 2,550 rpm; feed 0.03 mm/rev → feed rate ≈ 76 mm/min; 200 mm ≈ 2.6 min cut + ~0.5 min load & retract ≈ 3 min.

2
Machine cost

3 min at $60/hr = $60/60 × 3 = $3.00.

3
Tooling

Carbide gundrill ~$80–$150 spread over many holes per regrind ≈ $0.50–$1.00.

4
Coolant & misc

Oil, filtration, inspection ≈ $0.30.

5
Total

≈ $4 per hole — at $40/hr and a faster 2-min cycle it drops below $2. The same math, scaled up, is why a Ø150 mm × 3 m trepanned bore runs $200–$600.

⚠️ These are planning numbers, not quotes: real cost depends on your machine rate, tooling supply and the part. Use the Cost Per Hole Calculator to model your own part.

What the Tooling Really Costs

Tooling is the 10–20% of cost most often mis-priced. Published figures:

ItemTypical priceCost driver
Carbide gundrill (~Ø40 mm)~$180Reground 8–10× before re-tip
Indexable gundrill body~$620–$680Body only; inserts indexed, no regrind
BTA indexable insert~$10 each3–6 edges per insert
Special / form BTA head$1,000–$5,000+Aerospace form tools
✅ The brazed-vs-indexable rule: below ~Ø20 mm, brazed heads are cheaper per hole (low initial cost, discarded when dull); above ~Ø20 mm, indexable tooling wins on cost-per-hole because you index the insert instead of regrinding or replacing the head — and on-machine insert change slashes downtime. In one aerospace case, a competitor’s $5,000 brazed BTA head lasted only 2 holes; an indexable head costing a fifth of it ran 43 holes per insert, cutting cost per hole from $136 to $7.89 — a 99.85% saving that paid for itself in 15 parts.

Batch Size & the Make-or-Buy Decision

Batch size shifts the cost structure. On a job-shop part, setup and fixed costs dominate short runs and fall off fast as quantity rises (fixed-cost share of per-part price at 10 pcs ≈ 71%, 100 pcs ≈ 28%, 500 pcs ≈ 9%, 2,000 pcs ≈ 3%). For deep holes, the same logic applies to the machine purchase — which is why small-volume users retrofit ejector systems or outsource rather than buy a dedicated machine.

Outsourcing break-even. Decide in-house vs. contract with the classic quantity:

Break-even quantity = Fixed costs ÷ (purchase price per hole − in-house variable cost per hole)

Above the break-even, in-house wins; below it, outsourcing converts fixed cost into variable cost and frees capacity. Example: if a gundrill machine adds $250k of fixed cost and a job runs $5/hole in-house vs. $9/hole outsourced, break-even is 250,000 ÷ 4 = 62,500 holes.

⚠️ Avoid the accounting “death spiral”: when volume drops, the overhead burden rate per hour rises (e.g. $30M overhead ÷ 250k hrs = $120/hr at full capacity, but $200/hr at 150k hrs) — making in-house look progressively more expensive and pushing work out, which raises the rate further. Fix the denominator at “if kept busy” hours when comparing make vs. buy. Also price in the hidden in-house costs: downtime, rework, under-utilized capacity, and management time. See the Make vs Buy guide.

What Moves the Number Most

1
Diameter

Cost scales faster than diameter — chips, coolant and power all grow. Design for the smallest standard bore that works.

2
Depth & L/D

Deeper holes slow feed and add whip/support costs. Beyond ~40:1, most machines need steady rests and dampers.

3
Material

Superalloys and hardened steels cut speeds 50–80% and multiply tool cost.

4
Method

Choosing BTA when gundrilling would do (or vice versa) is the single biggest cost error on large bores.

Ways to Cut Cost Per Hole

✅ Cost-per-hole modeling pays for itself: a 10% cycle-time saving on a 1,000-hole job buys a lot of engineering time. See the Cost Per Hole Analysis guide for the full method.

Keep Reading